Oracle Universal Permissive License Agreement
Many languages have developed ecosystems of related tools that help create artifacts for distribution. While these tools are not always provided under an otherwise compatible license, we have approved the inclusion of certain tools in Apache distributions when used for this specific purpose. The following license applies to all parts of this software except as shown below: Many proprietary or open source software companies sell the copy of the software with a license to use. There is no transfer of ownership of the goods to the user who does not have the guarantee of the lifetime availability of the software, nor the right to sell, rent, give to anyone, copy or redistribute on the Web. The license terms may establish other legal terms that users cannot negotiate individually or through a consumer organization and that can clearly accept or reject the product by returning the product to the seller. [7] This right can be effectively exercised if the court provides for a mandatory period for the rejection of the goods immediately after purchase (as in European Union law) or the mandatory public publication of the terms of the license in order to make them readable by users before purchase. Free and open source licenses are generally divided into two categories: those whose purpose is to have minimum requirements on how the software can be redistributed (permissive licenses) and identical protective licenses (copyleft licenses). You may choose one of the two licenses that govern your use of this software only if you accept all the terms of the Apache license or the GPL license. Most distributed software can be classified by license type (see table). Developing Perl bindings that bind compiled C code to create dynamically loaded XS modules requires the inclusion of Perl-licensed header files (dev.perl.org/licenses/ – GPL-any/Artistic1, with exceptions). Since many proprietary “licenses” list only the rights that the user already has under 17 U.S.C. ยง 117, and yet announce that the rights will be taken away from the user, these contracts cannot be considered.
Proprietary software licenses often give software manufacturers more control over how their software is used by retaining ownership of each copy of the software with the software publisher. In this way, Section 117 does not apply to the end user, and the software provider can then require the end user to accept all the terms of the license agreement, many of which may be more restrictive than copyright alone. The form of the relationship determines whether it is a lease or a purchase. B e.g. UMG v. Augusto[8] or Vernor v. Doug Lea the competing library is in the public domain, but contains some Sun files that are not in the public domain. You can include this library in ASF products, similar to the resources in the weak Copyleft list above. “It can be contained in binary form in an Apache product if the inclusion is labeled accordingly.” If you`re using the source, delete the files that Sun licensed to Doug and treat them as Category A files (or get the files from Harmony). It doesn`t matter, unless the terms of this platform affect the license of the Apache product. For example, creating a product that runs on Windows or Java, uses a web service like Google Services or Yahoo Search, or is a plugin for a product like JBoss or JIRA is fine, while building a Linux kernel module is not acceptable because the Apache product itself should be licensed other than the Apache license.
Version 2.0. This license is subject to the following condition: In the United States, Section 117 of the Copyright Act gives the owner of a particular copy of the software the express right to use the software with a computer, even if using the software with a computer requires minor copies or adaptations (actions that could otherwise constitute copyright infringement). Therefore, the owner of a copy of the computer software is legally authorized to use that copy of the software. Therefore, if the end user of the software is the owner of the respective copy, the end user can legally use the software without a license from the software publisher. You can use material under the following licenses, as described above: Many of these licenses have specific attribution requirements that the project must meet, often by adding them to the NOTICE file. Be sure to do this when you include these works. This policy provides guidance on licensing Apache Software Foundation projects. It identifies acceptable licenses to include third-party open source components in Apache Software Foundation products. You can include software in binary form in an Apache product under the following licenses if you mark the inclusion accordingly (see above): It has been discussed for some time whether public domain software and public domain type licenses can be considered some kind of FOSS license.
Around 2004, attorney Lawrence Rosen argued in the essay “Why the Public Domain Is Not a License” that software could not really be published in the public domain and therefore could not be interpreted as a very permissive FOSS license,[26] a position rejected by Daniel J. Amber and others. [27] In 2012, the dispute was finally settled when Rosen accepted CC0 as an open source license while admitting that, contrary to his earlier claims, copyright can be waived, supported by decisions of the Ninth Circle. [28] Any person receiving a copy of this Software and related documentation files (the “Software”) is hereby granted permission, free of charge, to negotiate the Software without restriction, including, but not limited to, the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense and/or sell copies of the Software and persons, to whom the Software is made available to enable this to happen. Under the following conditions: In addition to granting rights and restrictions on the use of copyrighted software, software licenses generally contain provisions that allocate responsibility among the parties entering into the license agreement. For transactions with commercial companies and software, these terms often include limitations of liability, warranties and disclaimers of warranties, as well as indemnities if the software infringes the intellectual property rights of individuals. All licensed Category B works can be included in purely binary form in Apache Software Foundation comfort binaries. Do not include licensed Category B works in the source versions. Many manufacturers offer special conditions for schools and authorities (EDU/GOV license). Migration from another product (Crossgrade), also from another manufacturer (competitive upgrade) is offered. [21] Apache projects cannot license Category X components in source or binary form. in asf source code or in commodity binaries.
.
Recent Comments